freibiergesicht replied to your photo: good vibes why do you hate me
freibiergesicht replied to your photo: good vibes why do you hate me
i don’t even recognize them anymore. seriously, what happened to them.
our local store is still rly cool (or maybe i’m just biased because all the sales associates are super hot) but ick what is this
good vibes why do you hate me
Hello my lovely friends,
Do any of you have experience with the law or know lawyers? I ask because I am pressing charges against the restaurant for firing me for being raped in their parking lot. I am working with an advocate group and they are providing me assistance free of charge.
The only thing is, they just sent me the charges I’m going to file and I swear to godstiel it’s like it’s written in a foreign language. They asked me to “look it over and say if it looks alright”, but how can I do that if I don’t know what ‘alright’ looks like for a lawyer?
Could any of you ask around, or perhaps reblog this in the hopes some person with a legal degree would be willing to do me a random act of kindness and look over about 5 pages or legal documents? It’s not much, but it’s confusing to me and hard to think about because it’s a sensitive subject.
If anyone can help, my ask and submit boxes are open. Thank you!!
(via homoviper)
Superpower roulette, the page you get is your new superpower. -
The ability to manipulate the boundary between illusion and reality.
The ability to control and manipulate remnants of a dead star.
The ability to develop a mental link with another living being, which remains as a connection to that individual.
Power to copy the powers of others through an empathic bond and already know how to use said power.
Astral vision, able to see overlapping dimensions beyond the physical plane of existence. Sick.
“musical empathy”
um fuck this shit
electronic disruption
he power to disrupt electronics. Sub-Power of Technology Manipulation and Disruption.
this is better than last time i did this when i got peanut whisperer or something like that.
Disruption Inducement
The ability to disrupt all systems whether they be biological, mechanical or even supernatural. Sub-Power of Chaos Manipulation and Biological, Technology and Superpower Manipulation
THE INTERNET UNDERSTANDS ME SO WELL
astral trapping. uses:
sounds sufficiently awesome
(Source: professorsteel)
true story it used to be my dream to be a decoy
(Source: gruffaluf, via homoviper)
Queen Latifah comes out at Gay Pride Parade -
“Y’all my peeps (people),” she said, referring to the LGBT community. “I love you!” Queen performed for more than an hour, rocking the festival with her hits like “U.N.I.T.Y” and “Ladies First.” From the moment Queen told the crowd that she “has been waiting to do this for a long time”, it was clear that the event would be no ordinary. She later on added that she was “proud to be among her people”.
The 42 year old, Latifah thanked the crowd for their support and advised them to keep safe. Thank you to all my favorite peep guests who came out to support me. I appreciate it. I love you so much. Hope you had a beautiful time,” she said. “Y’all be safe whatever y’all get into tonight. Boys –- strap it up. Ladies –- strap it up.”
Aww, yay! Ok, I’m glad that she felt safe and good enough to come out!
I was afraid she was outed for a moment, but I’m so glad she came out on her own.AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
ok, but “y’all are my people” is a phrase that like…. just means you feel like you belong/connected somewhere for whatever reason, right, not necessarily that you are the exactly same. i def would have said gays were my people waaay before i accepted i was gay. and in fact, i’m sure we can all think of at least one straight person who has said the gay community is their home. idk, it just seems like people are using ANY LITTLE THING to declare “QUEEN LATIFAH CAME OUT!!” and so that actually is more like outing.
(via laceandcombatboots)
ceasesilence reblogged your quote: You may believe abortion is wrong. We respect your…
Changed the cissexist wording.This is a quote from an actual historical document. You can have a problem with the wording but I have a serious problem with you erasing these women’s words. That’s really not ok.
I didn’t change it and pretend that’s what they originally said. I clearly say that I changed it. Anyone who doesn’t like the change can reblog the original. I don’t see the problem.
femmenoire, your problem should be with the historical document that is cissexist. What does that say when you take offense to somebody pointing out the document is oppressive to them and changing it so that it isn’t anymore? You’re a shitty ally if you think it’s okay to post or reblog something cissexist without at least pointing out that it is so.
When did I take offense to the cissexism being pointed out here? When?
What I said was that it is wrong to erase these African American women’s words. I’m an historian and I believe that people’s words ideas about their lives should be respected. I also said that you can critique that but to change those words is NOT. OK.
And one more times, it’s a historical document talking specifically about the ciswoman’s experiences who wrote it. I would never change that.
You took offense to ceasesilence pointing out the cissexism by changing it to gender neutral terms. Ceasesilence did not erase the point of the document, ze erased the cissexism. I’m a womanist and I believe that you have no right to be oppressive or to try to deny this quote you’re clinging to is oppressive. If you believe in respect, try practicing it first. Being a historian is not a get out of jail free card to be a shitty ally. If you think it’s not okay to erase the cissexist terms, you obviously think it’s okay to shit all over transgender people’s lives, and that’s not okay.
So the historical context of that wording & the fact that it was explicitly about a history in which black cis women were being forced to breed doesn’t matter? Oh. Okay.
You don’t EVER change what the author was saying in a primary source document. It doesn’t matter what they were saying or how bigoted they were being. Altering an historical document is ahistorical and wrong. We do not apply our present-day views to them, we examine them in the context in which they took place (which karnythia already pointed out). In fact, changing the wording of an historical document simply erases whatever problematic wording that was there and erases any evidence of cissexism existing in said document, which is not a good thing because it alters the historical record to ignore that instance of cissexism.
besides all the above commentary, i wonder if every quote that uses “he”/”his” generally (to mean “people”) gets corrected, or if it only happens when someone uses “her.” cuz i have to say, i’ve only seen the latter.
4th of july at casa softy
pug patriots
(Source: animalsthatdopeoplethings)
i barely survived two days wearing trial contacts while i waited for them
(and in fact wore my broken, cracked glasses, which i actually broke on saturday, over the weekend so i didn’t have to wear contacts lol)
i don’t know how people live with that junk directly on their eyes
why can girlfriend mean both someone you are dating and lady pals you hang out with, but boyfriend ONLY means someone you’re dating
yeah let’s put a moratorium on the word girlfriend as meaning “female friend” people
you can just say friend there is literally no reason to say girlfriend
i am so tired of this for real
because older women call their lady friends “girlfriend” and i’m like :o and then i realize they’re 100% hetero
and then i talk about my girlfriend and they still read me as straight because they only hear “friend who is a girl”